1. What, in your opinion, does the author mean by "human-centric computers?" Does this mean computers should be more like people?

2. Often we factor obsolescence into our purchase of computer equipment and upgrade continuously. Dertouzos describes this as being brainwashed to think we have more efficient or faster computers when, actually, we are experiencing even greater inefficiency. Aside from personal computers, what other technologies can you think of that are similarly inefficient?

3. There is a persistent image in our popular culture of a world running amok with over-intelligent computers that seek to dominate their creators. How is this model different from the one that Michael Dertouzos presents?

4. What is the difference between human intelligence and computer intelligence? Can computers be trained to "think?" On what level?

5. Discuss the differences in the ways computers see and the way humans see. How can computer vision and human vision become compatible?

6. Dertouzos mentions medicine, emergency response and commerce as areas that will benefit greatly from human-centered computing. What other arenas can you think of that would benefit?

7. Besides the example offered in the book of a streamlined, computerized doctor visit, how do you think human-centered computers could advance medicine? Do you see a potential conflict between the human touch and the human-centered computer? Could the latter ever replace the former?

8. One of the author's five key technologies is automation -- getting computers to work together to save humans time and energy and increase efficiency. Discuss some specific ways, other than those presented in the book, that this could be effected.

9. In your opinion, will the increased efficiency of computers eliminate human jobs? Why or why not? What opportunities and jobs might result for people when/if computers become more human-centric?

10. Part of the author's vision for human-centered computers includes linking various information systems to create individualized information. Does this interconnectedness mean a loss of privacy? Can privacy be insured when there is such a wholesale exchange of information? How?

11. Dertouzos makes a compelling argument that whenever technology advances so do its potential abuses. Given human nature as you see it, will the advantages of a human-centric society outweigh its disadvantages?